Learning objectives
By the end of this week, you will be able to:
- Explain why a resume tailored to one specific job posting tends to perform better than a single generic resume sent to every employer.
- Apply a practical method for tailoring a resume with AI help, using your own real experience and a specific job posting, without inventing new experience.
- Draft a tailored cover letter that connects your real experience to a specific employer's stated needs.
- Use an AI tool for interview preparation through role-play, and describe the honest limits of that kind of practice.
- Research a prospective employer with an AI tool, and independently verify anything it reports as fact before relying on it.
- Describe balanced considerations involved in deciding whether, when, and how to disclose a disability during a job search.
- Describe your own AI skills, built across this course, truthfully and specifically on a resume or in an interview answer.
- Complete a full tailored job application package as a portfolio project, applying verification habits at every step.
Lesson
Every skill you have built in this course now has a very specific target: getting hired, or moving forward in the career you already have. This week takes the professional writing, publishing, and communication skills built earlier in this course and points all of it directly at the job search itself. It also reaches back to the skills roadmap from earlier in this course, the discussion that first named the skills employers value and asked you to start thinking about how you would describe them on a resume. This week is where that roadmap becomes a real, tailored resume, a real cover letter, real interview practice, and a real answer to one of the most personal questions in any job search: whether, when, and how to disclose a disability.
Why one resume is not enough
A resume is a short document that summarizes your work history, skills, and education for a potential employer. Most job seekers, understandably, want to write one resume and send the same version to every job they apply for. It feels efficient. It is also one of the most common reasons a qualified applicant gets passed over.
A job posting, the notice an employer publishes describing an open position, its duties, and the qualifications they are looking for, tells you exactly what that employer cares about most, in that employer's own words. A generic resume, written once and reused everywhere, cannot reflect the specific language, priorities, or order of importance in any single posting, because it was written before you ever saw that posting. Two job postings for what sounds like the same job title can ask for very different things: one might emphasize customer communication, another might emphasize data accuracy, and a third might emphasize working independently with little supervision. A resume that treats all three postings the same way is, in a real sense, not really written for any of them.
This matters for a very practical reason. Many employers, especially larger ones, read dozens or hundreds of resumes for a single opening, often skimming quickly for the specific skills and words the posting itself uses. A resume that uses the same words and priorities as the posting is easier for a busy reader, human or software, to recognize as a strong match. A resume that uses different words for the same underlying skills, even when the skills are genuinely there, is easier to overlook. Tailoring is not about dishonesty or exaggeration. It is about describing your real experience using the language and priorities of the specific job in front of you, so the match is obvious rather than something the reader has to work to find.
Earlier in this course you learned to draft a professional resume with AI help, edit it critically, and keep your own voice in the result. This week builds directly on that foundation by adding one more step: doing that same careful, voice-preserving editing work again, in a shorter and more targeted way, for every single job posting you seriously apply to.
A practical method for tailoring your resume with AI
Tailoring a resume for every single job posting sounds like a lot of extra work, and if you started from a blank page each time, it would be. The practical method this lesson teaches avoids that by using two things you already have: your base resume, the honest, complete version of your work history and skills you built earlier in this course, and the text of the job posting itself.
Here is the method in plain steps. First, keep one well-built base resume. Second, when you find a job posting you want to apply to, copy the full text of that posting, not just the job title. Third, give an AI tool both documents in the same conversation: your base resume and the job posting text. Fourth, ask the AI tool a specific question, something like, "Here is my resume and a job posting. Based only on what is already in my resume, which experiences and skills should I emphasize, and how might I reorder or reword them to match this posting more closely?" That last phrase, "based only on what is already in my resume," is the most important part of the whole prompt.
That phrase matters because of a caution given earlier in this course: AI tools can hallucinate, meaning they can generate confident, believable-sounding statements that are not actually true. On most tasks, a hallucination is an annoying error you catch and fix. On a resume, a hallucination is far more serious. An invented certification, an exaggerated number, or a skill you do not actually have is not a small mistake. It can cost you a job offer if a hiring manager checks it, it can cost you the job itself if you are hired and cannot actually do what your resume claimed, and it can damage your professional reputation in ways that follow you well beyond that one application. The rule for this week is simple and non-negotiable: an AI tool may help you say your real experience more clearly and more relevantly. It may never add experience, credentials, numbers, or skills you did not actually have.
Here is a worked example of what tailoring looks like in practice. Imagine a job posting for a customer support role that specifically says the employer wants someone "experienced with ticketing systems and comfortable troubleshooting technical issues independently." Now imagine your base resume includes this bullet point describing a past job: "Answered phones and helped customers with issues." That bullet is honest, but it is vague, and it does not use any of the specific language from the posting. Nothing in it tells the reader whether you have used a ticketing system, or whether you can troubleshoot independently.
Now imagine that, in the past job that bullet describes, you actually did use a shared ticketing system every day, and you actually did solve most problems yourself before asking for help. A tailored version of that same, true experience might read: "Resolved customer support requests using a shared ticketing system, troubleshooting technical issues independently and asking for help only when a case required it." Notice what changed and what did not. The underlying facts did not change at all; you still did the same job, the same way. What changed is that the bullet now uses the posting's own language, ticketing system, troubleshooting, independently, so a reader can immediately see the match. If you happen to know a real, honest number, such as how many requests you typically handled, adding it can make the bullet even stronger. If you do not know that number, do not guess, and do not let an AI tool guess for you; simply leave it out and describe the duty clearly instead. A specific but invented number is worse than no number at all, because it is a fact a future employer could check.
This same method works for the summary section at the top of a resume, for the order in which you list your skills, and for which past jobs or projects you choose to describe in more detail. In every case, the AI tool's job is to help you see your own real experience more clearly through the lens of one specific posting, not to write experience you do not have.
Writing a cover letter that connects your experience to the job
A cover letter is a short letter, usually less than one page, sent along with a resume, that explains in the applicant's own words why they are a strong fit for a specific job at a specific organization. Where a resume lists your experience, a cover letter connects that experience directly to what the employer says they need, in a more personal, conversational voice.
The same tailoring principle from the resume section applies here, and so does the same warning. Give an AI tool your resume and the job posting together, and ask it to draft a first version of a cover letter that connects two or three of your strongest, most relevant real experiences to two or three things the posting specifically says the employer needs. Read that draft the way you have learned to read any AI-drafted document elsewhere in this course: critically, checking every factual claim, and rewriting anything that does not sound like you. A cover letter that sounds exactly like every other AI-drafted cover letter is not a strong cover letter, no matter how polished its sentences are. The goal is a letter that is clearly about you, in your own voice, edited and organized with AI help rather than written by it and left untouched.
A strong tailored cover letter usually does three things in a short space. It names the specific position and organization, showing you did not simply reuse the same letter everywhere. It connects one or two real, specific examples from your own background to something the posting explicitly asked for. And it closes by saying, plainly, that you are interested in the role and available to talk further. The accessibility check taught earlier in this course applies to a cover letter exactly as it applies to any other document you produce for an employer: check that the finished document, whichever format you send it in, is genuinely accessible before you share it.
Practicing interviews with AI role-play
Interview role-play means asking an AI tool to act as an interviewer for a specific job, asking you likely questions one at a time, and then giving you feedback on your practice answers. This is a conversation you start and direct with plain-language instructions, in the same way you have directed AI conversations throughout this course, not a separate, specialized feature with its own menu of buttons to learn.
To start a role-play session, describe the situation clearly in your first message: the job title, a short summary of the posting or the organization, and what you want the AI tool to do. A reasonable opening prompt might be, "Act as an interviewer for a customer support role at a mid-sized company. Ask me one interview question at a time, wait for my answer, and then give me honest, specific feedback on that answer before asking the next question." From there, answer each question the way you would in a real interview, then read the AI's feedback and try the answer again if you want more practice.
This kind of practice is genuinely useful. It gives you a low-pressure space to hear your own answers out loud, or read them back, before a real interview raises the stakes. It can help you notice when an answer rambles, when it leaves out a concrete example, or when it does not actually answer the question that was asked. One structure worth practicing with is naming the situation you were in, the task you needed to do, the action you actually took, and the result, sometimes called the STAR structure, since interviewers in many fields respond well to concrete, specific stories told in that order.
At the same time, this lesson wants to be completely honest about the limits of this practice, the same honest approach used earlier in this course when discussing what AI tools can and cannot reliably do. An AI interviewer is not a substitute for a real one. It cannot fully predict what an actual human interviewer at a specific company will ask, since real interviewers bring their own priorities, follow-up questions, and sometimes unpredictable curiosity that a role-play conversation cannot fully anticipate. It also cannot replicate the real pressure, pacing, or back-and-forth of an actual conversation with another person in the room or on the call. Treat AI role-play as valuable rehearsal for structure, clarity, and confidence, not as a complete simulation of the real event. Practicing with a trusted person, a career counselor, or a disability employment service, where available, remains valuable alongside this AI practice, not instead of it.
Researching a prospective employer with AI
Before an interview, it helps to know something about the organization: what it does, what has been happening with it recently, and what the interview is likely to focus on given the role. An AI tool can give you a fast starting summary of an employer's general background, recent public news, and the kind of skills a posting like this one tends to emphasize, based on patterns in similar postings.
This is also exactly the kind of task where the verification habits taught earlier in this course matter the most, because the stakes are high in a very specific way. If you repeat something inaccurate about a company during an interview, an outdated fact, a wrong detail about a product or a leader, or something the AI tool simply invented, it can undermine an interviewer's confidence in you at the worst possible moment. Employer research errors are high stakes precisely because they show up in front of the one person deciding whether to hire you, not in a private draft you can quietly correct later.
The practical habit is straightforward: use an AI tool to get oriented quickly, then independently verify anything you plan to actually say out loud, using the employer's own website, a recent news search, or another independent source, before an interview. Treat the AI's summary as a starting point for your own research, not as the finished research itself. This is the same "trust, but verify independently" pattern taught earlier in this course for any AI output, applied here to one of the higher-stakes moments of the entire job search.
Deciding whether, when, and how to disclose a disability
At some point in almost every job search, a blind or low vision job seeker faces a genuinely personal question: whether to tell a potential employer about their disability, and if so, when and how. This lesson will not tell you the single right answer, because there is not one. The right choice depends on your own situation, your own comfort, the kind of work and workplace involved, and considerations that are yours alone to weigh.
A few honest, balanced considerations are worth naming clearly, without pretending any one of them settles the question for everyone. Legal protections against disability discrimination, and legal requirements that employers provide reasonable accommodation, exist in many places, but the exact legal protections, processes, and terminology vary by country, by region, and sometimes by employer size. This lesson will not state specific legal details as fact, since they vary too much to teach reliably in a general course; if the legal side of disclosure matters to your decision, an AI tool can help you find general starting information, but you should verify anything it tells you against a trusted, current source, such as a disability employment service or an official government resource for your location, before relying on it.
Accommodation needs are a second consideration. If you know you will need a specific accommodation to complete the interview process itself, such as materials in an accessible format or extra time on a written exercise, disclosing early enough to request that accommodation may be necessary, regardless of your broader feelings about disclosure. If your accommodation needs mostly relate to the day-to-day job rather than the interview process itself, some job seekers choose to wait until after receiving an offer to discuss those needs in detail, while others prefer to raise them earlier so expectations are clear from the start. Both approaches are reasonable, and different people, even people with very similar disabilities, often make different choices here based on their own experience and comfort.
Personal comfort and workplace culture are a third consideration, and this one is entirely yours to weigh. Some job seekers feel more comfortable being open about their disability from the very first application, seeing it as simply part of who they are professionally. Others prefer to establish their skills and qualifications first, and discuss disability only once they are further along in the process or have an offer in hand. Neither approach is more correct than the other. What matters is that the choice is genuinely yours, made with clear information rather than fear or pressure, and revisited for each job search or each employer if your own comfort changes over time.
An AI tool can be a useful, private sounding board while you think this through. You can ask it to help you list out the considerations on each side for your specific situation, or to help you draft language you might use if you do decide to disclose, in a tone that feels right to you. What an AI tool cannot do, and should not be asked to do, is make this decision for you. It is your decision, about your own life and your own comfort, and this lesson's job is only to make sure you are making it with clear, balanced information rather than with only one side of the picture.
Presenting your AI skills as a real competitive advantage
Earlier in this course, six skill areas were named as valuable to employers: prompt fluency, AI-assisted writing, data handling, automation, customer communication, and digital content. Since then, this course has spent week after week building every one of those skills, from your first careful prompts to drafting professional documents, publishing them in accessible formats, and writing clear professional email. This week is where all of that turns into something an employer can actually see: a specific, honest line on a resume or a specific, confident answer in an interview.
The mistake to avoid is describing your AI skills too vaguely. A resume line that simply says "I use AI" tells an employer almost nothing, because by now, a great many applicants could say the same three words truthfully, without it meaning very much. A competitive advantage, something that makes you stand out in a genuinely useful way, comes from being specific about what you actually did and what the result actually was, the same specificity this lesson has asked you to bring to every tailored resume bullet.
Compare two ways of describing the same underlying skill. The vague version might say, "Familiar with AI tools." A specific, truthful version, built from real experience in this course, might say something like, "Used AI tools to draft, tailor, and edit professional documents and correspondence, verifying every factual claim before sending," or "Built a simple, repeating AI-assisted process to summarize weekly information, checked for accuracy every time it ran." Each specific version names an actual skill, ties it to a real outcome, and, notably, mentions verification, which signals to an employer that you use these tools responsibly rather than blindly, exactly the verification habit built into you earlier in this course.
This same specificity works in an interview answer, not only on a resume. If asked about your experience with AI tools, a strong answer names a real tool you have used, a real task you used it for, and a real habit you follow to check its work, rather than a general, unspecific claim that you "know AI." That kind of answer does two things at once: it demonstrates a skill employers increasingly value, and it demonstrates the judgment to use that skill well, which is very often the more important of the two.
Key terms from this week
Use this list to review the vocabulary introduced in this lesson before you start the exercises and the test.
- Tailored resume
- A resume edited, for one specific job posting, to emphasize and describe your real experience using that posting's own language and priorities, rather than one generic resume sent to every employer.
- Cover letter
- A short letter sent with a resume that explains, in the applicant's own words, why the applicant is a strong fit for a specific job at a specific organization.
- Interview role-play
- A practice method in which an AI tool acts as an interviewer for a specific role, asking likely questions and giving feedback on practice answers, understood as valuable rehearsal rather than a full substitute for a real interview.
- Disclosure
- The personal decision of whether, when, and how to tell a potential employer about a disability during a job search, with no single right answer for every person or situation.
Keyboard-only exercises
These exercises use only your keyboard. Screen reader commands are described in general terms below; substitute your own screen reader's equivalent command where needed.
Exercise 1: Tailor one resume bullet point with AI
- Open a text editor and open your base resume file from earlier in this course. If you do not have one yet, create a short one now with two or three bullet points describing real past work.
- Using Say All, or your screen reader's continuous reading command, read through your resume once from the top.
- Open a web browser and find one real or practice job posting for a role you might apply to.
- Select the full text of the posting with Ctrl plus A, then copy it with Ctrl plus C.
- Open a new file in your text editor with Ctrl plus N, paste the posting text with Ctrl plus V, and save it with Ctrl plus S.
- Open an AI chatbot you have used earlier in this course. Press Tab until focus reaches the message entry box.
- Type or paste your resume and the job posting text into one message, then ask the AI tool which of your real experiences and skills it would emphasize for this posting, and how it would reword one bullet point to match the posting's language. Include the phrase "based only on what is already in my resume" in your message.
- Using Say All, or your screen reader's continuous reading command, read the AI tool's suggested bullet point in full. Check your own screen reader's shortcut for continuous reading if you are not sure what it is.
- Compare the suggested bullet against your real experience, and edit it yourself in your text editor until it is both fully accurate and closely matched to the posting's language.
- Save your tailored bullet point as
tailored-resume-bullet, in the same folder you used for your earlier resume documents.
Exercise 2: Practice an AI role-play interview
- Open an AI chatbot and press Tab until focus reaches the message entry box.
- Type an opening message describing a specific job title, a short summary of the posting or organization, and clear instructions: ask the AI tool to act as an interviewer, ask one question at a time, wait for your answer, and then give honest, specific feedback before asking the next question.
- Using Say All, or your screen reader's continuous reading command, read the AI tool's first interview question.
- Type a full practice answer to that question, using the situation, task, action, and result structure from this week's lesson where it fits.
- Read the AI tool's feedback with Say All, or your screen reader's continuous reading command. Check your own screen reader's shortcut for continuous reading if you are not sure what it is.
- Repeat steps 3 through 5 for at least three interview questions in the same session.
- Open a new file in your text editor, Ctrl plus N, and write down at least two specific things you would improve in your practice answers.
- Save the file as
interview-practice-notes, in your working folder for this week.
Exercise 3: Research a prospective employer and verify one fact
- Choose a prospective employer, either a real organization or one connected to the practice job posting you used in Exercise 1.
- Open an AI chatbot and, in the message entry box, ask it for a short summary of that employer's general background, recent public news, and the kind of skills its postings tend to emphasize.
- Read the summary in full using Say All, or your screen reader's continuous reading command.
- Choose one specific factual claim from the summary that you might actually say out loud in an interview.
- Open a web browser, press Ctrl plus L to move focus to the address and search bar, and search for the employer's own website or another independent source to check that claim.
- Using Say All, read the independent source and confirm whether the claim was accurate, outdated, or incorrect.
- Open your text editor, Ctrl plus N, and write down the claim, whether it checked out, and the independent source you used to verify it.
- Save the file as
employer-research-check, in your working folder for this week.
Portfolio project: My Tailored Job Application
This week's portfolio piece brings together every skill from this week into one real, usable application package: a tailored resume summary, a tailored cover letter, evidence of interview practice, and your own written approach to disclosure.
- Choose one real or practice job posting you are genuinely interested in, and save its full text in your working folder for this week.
- Using the method from this week's lesson, give an AI tool your base resume from earlier in this course and this job posting, and draft a tailored resume summary. Verify every fact in the result against your real background, and correct or remove anything that is not accurate.
- Using the same posting, draft a tailored cover letter with AI help, then edit it critically so it sounds like your own voice, following the editing habits and the accessibility check taught earlier in this course.
- Complete at least one AI role-play interview practice session for this posting, following Exercise 2, and write down at least two specific things you would improve.
- Write a short paragraph, in your own words, describing your own disclosure approach for this kind of job search: whether, when, and how you would currently choose to disclose a disability, and why.
- Save all five pieces, the job posting, the tailored resume summary, the tailored cover letter, your interview practice notes, and your disclosure paragraph, together in one folder named
my-tailored-job-application.
Use this checklist to confirm your project is complete:
- One real or practice job posting is saved in full.
- A tailored resume summary is drafted and every fact in it has been checked against your real background.
- A tailored cover letter is drafted, edited to sound like your own voice, and checked for accessibility.
- At least one AI role-play interview session is complete, with at least two written improvements noted.
- A short paragraph on your own disclosure approach is written.
- All five pieces are saved together in one clearly named folder.
Weekly test
This test has 50 questions: 30 multiple choice questions, 15 true or false questions, and 5 short answer questions. Every question can be answered using this week's lesson. A score of 38 correct answers out of 50 is a pass. For multiple choice and true or false questions, choose one answer per question. For short answer questions, type a brief answer in your own words.
Answer key
Each answer below includes a one-sentence explanation drawn from this week's lesson.
| Question | Correct answer | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A. It does not reflect the specific language and priorities of that one posting | The lesson states a generic resume cannot reflect the specific language, priorities, or order of importance in any single posting. |
| 2 | B. Your base resume and the text of the job posting | The lesson's method has you give an AI tool both your base resume and the full text of the job posting in the same conversation. |
| 3 | C. Suggest which real experiences and skills to emphasize and how to reword them | The lesson's suggested prompt asks the AI tool which existing experiences and skills to emphasize, based only on what is already in the resume. |
| 4 | D. It can cost you a job offer or the job itself, and damage your professional reputation | The lesson explains an invented resume claim can cost a job offer, cost the job itself, and damage professional reputation. |
| 5 | A. Leave it out and describe the duty clearly instead of guessing | The lesson states a specific but invented number is worse than no number, and the duty should be described clearly instead. |
| 6 | B. A short letter sent with a resume explaining why the applicant is a strong fit for a specific job | The lesson defines a cover letter as a short letter sent with a resume that explains why the applicant is a strong fit for a specific job. |
| 7 | C. Name the specific position and organization, connect real examples to the posting's needs, and close by expressing interest | The lesson lists naming the position and organization, connecting real examples to stated needs, and closing with interest as the three things. |
| 8 | D. Describing your real experience using the language and priorities of the specific job | The lesson states tailoring is about describing real experience in the posting's language, not dishonesty or exaggeration. |
| 9 | A. Asking an AI tool to act as an interviewer, ask likely questions, and give feedback on your practice answers | The lesson defines interview role-play as asking an AI tool to act as an interviewer and give feedback on practice answers. |
| 10 | B. Describe the job title, a short summary of the posting, and what you want the AI tool to do | The lesson recommends describing the job title, a posting summary, and clear instructions to open a role-play session. |
| 11 | C. Naming the situation, the task, the action taken, and the result | The lesson names the situation, task, action, and result structure, sometimes called STAR, for telling concrete stories. |
| 12 | D. No, it is valuable rehearsal but not a full substitute for a real one | The lesson states plainly that an AI interviewer is not a substitute for a real one, though it is valuable rehearsal. |
| 13 | A. What an actual human interviewer at a specific company will ask | The lesson explains an AI interviewer cannot fully predict what a real human interviewer will actually ask. |
| 14 | B. Practicing with a trusted person, a career counselor, or a disability employment service | The lesson states practicing with a trusted person, counselor, or employment service remains valuable alongside AI practice. |
| 15 | C. As a conversation the learner starts and directs with plain-language prompts | The lesson describes role-play as a conversation started and directed with plain-language prompts, the same way AI conversations are directed throughout this course. |
| 16 | D. Give a fast starting summary of the employer's background, recent news, and likely interview focus areas | The lesson describes AI tools as useful for a fast starting summary of employer background, news, and likely focus areas. |
| 17 | A. An inaccurate claim can undermine an interviewer's confidence at the worst possible moment | The lesson explains employer research errors are high stakes because they surface in front of the person deciding whether to hire you. |
| 18 | B. Independently verify them using the employer's own website or another independent source | The lesson recommends independently verifying employer facts against the employer's own site or another independent source. |
| 19 | C. Treat it as a starting point for further, independent research | The lesson states the AI summary should be treated as a starting point, not the finished research. |
| 20 | D. The 'trust, but verify independently' pattern | The lesson names this the same 'trust, but verify independently' pattern taught earlier in this course. |
| 21 | A. Trust the independently verified source over the unverified AI summary | The lesson's verification habit means an independently checked source should be trusted over an unverified AI claim. |
| 22 | B. No, the lesson presents balanced considerations rather than one right answer | The lesson explicitly says there is no single right answer and presents balanced considerations instead. |
| 23 | C. The exact legal protections, processes, and terminology | The lesson states the exact legal protections, processes, and terminology around disclosure vary by country, region, and employer size. |
| 24 | D. When a specific accommodation is needed to complete the interview process itself | The lesson states disclosing early may be necessary when an accommodation is needed for the interview process itself. |
| 25 | A. List considerations on each side, or draft language for disclosure if the learner chooses to disclose | The lesson describes an AI tool as a sounding board that can help list considerations or draft disclosure language. |
| 26 | B. The learner, based on their own situation and comfort | The lesson states plainly that the decision is the learner's own, and an AI tool should not be asked to make it. |
| 27 | C. Prompt fluency, AI-assisted writing, data handling, automation, customer communication, and digital content | The lesson repeats the earlier list of six employer-valued skill areas. |
| 28 | D. It is too vague to stand out, since many applicants could say the same thing | The lesson states a vague line like 'I use AI' tells an employer almost nothing, since many applicants could say it. |
| 29 | A. A real tool you used, a real task, and a real habit you follow to check its work | The lesson states a strong interview answer names a real tool, a real task, and a real verification habit. |
| 30 | B. Describing it truthfully and specifically, not just saying 'I use AI' | The lesson concludes that a truthful, specific description of AI fluency is what makes it a genuine competitive advantage. |
| 31 | False | The lesson states a generic resume typically performs worse, not as well, as a tailored one. |
| 32 | False | The lesson's rule is that an AI tool may never add experience you did not actually have. |
| 33 | False | The lesson states an invented number is worse than no number, since it is a fact a future employer could check. |
| 34 | True | The lesson describes a cover letter as usually less than one page long. |
| 35 | False | The lesson says an AI-drafted cover letter should be read critically before it is sent. |
| 36 | True | This matches the lesson's definition of interview role-play. |
| 37 | False | The lesson states an AI interviewer is valuable rehearsal but not a full substitute for a real one. |
| 38 | True | The lesson names situation, task, action, and result as the STAR structure for interview stories. |
| 39 | False | The lesson states such practice remains valuable alongside AI role-play, not replaced by it. |
| 40 | True | The lesson describes this as a useful starting task for an AI tool before an interview. |
| 41 | False | The lesson requires independently verifying such facts before repeating them in an interview. |
| 42 | True | The lesson explains employer research errors are high stakes for exactly this reason. |
| 43 | False | The lesson explicitly says there is no single right answer for every person or situation. |
| 44 | True | The lesson states this is a case where early disclosure may be necessary regardless of broader feelings on the topic. |
| 45 | True | The lesson states mentioning verification signals that the applicant uses AI tools responsibly. |
| 46 | A tailored resume. | See this week's lesson section on tailoring a resume for the full explanation. |
| 47 | Interview role-play. | See this week's lesson section on practicing interviews with AI role-play for the full explanation. |
| 48 | Verify it independently, using the employer's own website or another independent source. | See this week's lesson section on researching a prospective employer for the full explanation. |
| 49 | Whether, when, and how to disclose a disability. | See this week's lesson section on disclosure for the full explanation. |
| 50 | A specific, truthful description of the tool used, the task, and the real result. | See this week's lesson section on presenting your AI skills for the full explanation. |